Sacred Site Mapping

Summary

Sacred Site Mapping is a process pioneered by Randolph Hester in Manteo, NC. This process identifies the "sacred spaces" of a community through mapping, inquiry and validation, combining observation techniques with information gathered from citizens.

Tool Description

Randolph Hester, Jr., a landscape architect at the University of California-Berkley, pioneered this approach in the Town of Manteo, NC in the early 1980s.  The participatory process assists a community with identifying its “sacred structure”—the buildings, places, and landscapes that are central to its function and character. 

Sacred sites, according to Hester, are rarely the loveliest vistas or most striking buildings—they are humble, often homely elements that are nonetheless at the center of a community’s daily life.  Sacred places may also be evident only in the background of community awareness—he found that it often takes work, and a way of looking at a community from a fresh perspective—for citizens to notice the most special places around them. 

In general, the process of mapping sacred spaces involves three main steps:

  1. identification and mapping of sacred places
  2. validation of the map or list
  3. implementation of protective measures for those sacred spaces

In a first attempt to identify sacred spaces, Hester conducted informal interviews and asked people about the most important places in their community.  He then used the process of “behavior mapping” to test the responses—he walked around the town, noted the places that people congregated and used, and identified the functions and uses of those places. He found ironically that the places people said were important were often not the places that he observed to be most critical to social functioning and town character.

Hester then “validated” his research using a newspaper survey, asking people to rank the value of the places he identified.  Those places ranked highest by respondents were considered most important to save or enhance. Hester finally translated the results into maps of the sacred spaces and guidelines for development or conservation.

Summary of Costs

$0-99
Associated Costs
  • Consulting
  • Facilitation
  • Project Management

Strengths

  • The combination of behavior mapping, interviews, and surveys produces results that are likely more accurate and different than what any of those methods would produce on its own.
  • The concrete products – maps – give a community important tools for evaluating development decisions and measuring results.
  • Sacred Site Mapping could be adjusted in many ways and to fit many budgets and community types.

Limitations

  • Sacred Site Mapping focuses mostly on the physical elements of community character.
  • Sacred Site Mapping, as pioneered by Hester, has not been replicated in many other communities, so there are few examples to learn from.
  • The meaning of the term “sacred space” has been muddied over the years, and other initiatives may be confused with this process.
Submitted By: svannostrand
Last Updated: August 16, 2012, 9:09 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.